BunnyPark Token Distribution: How Tokens Were Allocated and Who Got Them

When you look at a crypto project like BunnyPark, a blockchain-based game or platform that issues its own token for in-system use. Also known as BPK token, it's not just about buying in—it's about understanding how the supply was split from day one. Token distribution isn’t a technical footnote. It’s the foundation of trust. If too many tokens go to insiders, the project is rigged from the start. If too few go to the community, there’s no real incentive to use it. BunnyPark’s distribution tells you who had skin in the game—and who didn’t.

Most crypto projects break their token supply into five buckets: team, investors, public sale, liquidity, and treasury. For BunnyPark, reports suggest the team held around 15%, early backers got 20%, and the public got 30% through presales and staking rewards. Another 25% went to liquidity pools on DEXs like PancakeSwap, and the rest was locked in a treasury for future development. That’s not unusual—but what matters is vesting schedules, the time locks that prevent insiders from dumping tokens right after launch. If the team’s tokens unlocked all at once six months in, that’s a red flag. If they’re released slowly over two years, that shows alignment with long-term users. BunnyPark’s team tokens were locked for 18 months, which is better than most. The public sale tokens? No lock-up. That’s risky. It means early buyers could have sold big right after the token went live, crashing the price.

Then there’s the liquidity pool, the reserve of tokens paired with another asset (like BNB or USDT) to keep trading possible. If the team controls most of the liquidity, they can manipulate the price. BunnyPark’s liquidity was partially locked with a 12-month lock-up, which helped stabilize early trading. But the rest? Unlocked. That’s why the price swung wildly in the first 30 days. And don’t forget the tokenomics, the economic model behind how tokens are created, distributed, and burned. BunnyPark didn’t have a burn mechanism. No tokens were destroyed to reduce supply. That means inflation was always a risk. No supply cap either. So even if you got tokens early, the total number could grow forever.

What you’ll find in the posts below are real cases that mirror BunnyPark’s story. You’ll see how other token distributions went wrong—or right. You’ll learn what to check before you buy into any project, not just BunnyPark. Some posts expose fake airdrops that look like real token allocations. Others show how platforms like Binance and CoinMarketCap get misused to make shady projects look legit. There’s also deep dives into how tokenomics can make or break a game-based crypto. This isn’t theory. It’s what happened. And if you’re still holding BunnyPark—or thinking about it—you need to know what really happened behind the scenes.